As a nerd, one wants to find out everything there is to know in one’s field, such as the science behind zombies, aliens and superheroes. This drive is something that teachers and research communicators should use more, argues Raychelle Burks, a chemistry researcher at St. Edward’s University in Austin, Texas.
Peer review – collegial scrutiny of scientific articles – is a cornerstone of academic publishing. Yet the work is usually unpaid, and is also carried out anonymously. Now the Swedish editors of an international journal have instituted a prize to celebrate the best review of the year.
The organisation Addgene wants to make it easier for researchers in genetics to share material for basic research. They believe in a change, where more researchers are working towards a more open research culture.
Plan S is a European initiative, aimed at speeding up research results being openly accessible to all. According to the plan, all scientific results produced with the support of public funding bodies as from 2020 shall be published openly without delay. But the tight timeframe has been criticised.
Around 3.5 per cent of EU research funds come to Sweden. But, according to experts Curie has spoken to, this could be increased with more knowledge of the review process and better formulated applications.
The publishing giant Elsevier charges for both reading access and open publication online. For Swedish HEIs, this results in escalating costs. Talks broke down in May, and libraries have been excluded from reading since 1st July.
They are called predatory journals and supporting them is an unacceptable action according to the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. How do Swedish higher education institutions and research funding bodies see the phenomenon, and what are they doing about it?
Fast publication, open access and considerable impact. So-called predatory journals use false promises of peer review and a serious approach to offer the publication of scientific articles in return for payment. Curie has looked more closely at the phenomenon that is becoming increasingly common.
She blogs about the struggles and opportunities for women in science. Yildiz Kelahmetoglu is a PhD candidate at Karolinska Institutet and studies damage response and regeneration in central nervous system after injuries and diseases. In her spare time she enjoys to read short stories, run and dance some Lindy hop.
As a scientist, feeling that you have much more to give, but being thwarted because of your age. As head of department, refusing someone a position, a room, a doctoral student. Curie has talked with two researchers and a pro-vice-chancellor about research after 67 and about the conflicts that easily arise.